LLM · Computer Vision · NLP

AI systems that
run in production,
not just demos

Every project here is live, running on real data, serving real users. LLM deployment pipelines, computer vision systems, and NLP platforms built for the constraints that don't appear until something is genuinely at scale.

AI Track Record
48+
AI systems in production
1.2B
Tokens processed daily
94ms
Median inference latency
99.6%
Uptime across AI systems
8
Industries served with AI

LLM Deployment

Production language model systems - from fine-tuning to inference infrastructure

LLM E-Commerce · Series C

Customer support automation: 78% ticket deflection rate

A 3,000-SKU e-commerce platform handling 40,000 support tickets monthly - sizing, returns, tracking queries. We fine-tuned a support-specific model on 200k historical tickets, built a confidence-gated escalation layer, and deployed behind a streaming API that keeps TTFB under 400ms.

78% Ticket deflection
<400ms TTFB
GPT-4o fine-tune Streaming API LangChain Redis 95% customer satisfaction

Computer Vision

Visual intelligence systems - detection, classification, and quality control at scale

CV Manufacturing · Automotive Tier 1

Manufacturing defect detection: 0.03% escape rate on 60k units/day

A Tier 1 automotive supplier with a 2% defect escape rate causing costly downstream recalls. We deployed a multi-angle vision inspection system across 8 production lines - 12 cameras per line, custom-trained YOLOv8 models, edge inference on NVIDIA Jetson hardware, and real-time rejection triggering at line speed.

0.03% Defect escape rate
60k Units inspected/day
YOLOv8 NVIDIA Jetson Edge inference MQTT 12 cameras/line

NLP & Semantic Search

Language understanding, entity extraction, and AI-powered search at scale

NLP HR Tech · Series B

Semantic job matching: 3× application-to-hire rate improvement

A recruitment platform matching 200k job seekers to 40k live listings using keyword matching - producing irrelevant results that eroded candidate trust. We replaced the search layer with a bi-encoder semantic model fine-tuned on domain-specific job-skill relationships, with real-time personalisation based on engagement signals.

Application-to-hire rate
40k Live listings indexed
Sentence-BERT Elasticsearch bi-encoder Candidate ranking

From use case to production - without the detours

Most AI projects fail not because the model was wrong, but because the evaluation framework was missing, the deployment infrastructure wasn't considered, or the use case wasn't scoped tightly enough to succeed. These are the steps we take to avoid that.

01

Use Case Scoping

Before touching a model, we define what success looks like - the specific task, the performance threshold that makes it commercially viable, and the edge cases that would make it dangerous. Half the projects that come to us get a narrower scope recommendation before we start.

02

Data Audit & Baseline

We assess your existing data - quality, coverage, labelling consistency, and whether there's enough of it for the approach you have in mind. Then we establish a human baseline performance score to measure model performance against something real.

03

Model Selection & Evaluation

We test multiple model architectures against your specific task before committing to one. Fine-tuned small models frequently outperform GPT-4 on narrow tasks at a fraction of the inference cost. We run the evaluation and show you the numbers.

04

Inference Infrastructure

Latency requirements, concurrency, cost per inference, and failure modes - all designed before deployment. We build rate limiting, fallback paths, circuit breakers, and the observability layer that tells you when model quality drifts.

05

Monitoring & Retraining

Production AI systems degrade - input distributions shift, user behaviour changes, and the world the model was trained on stops reflecting the world it's running in. We build the monitoring to catch this and the retraining pipeline to fix it.

Model Selection - Task Benchmark (Redacted Client) Real Eval
GPT-4o
92% Chosen - legal clause extraction
GPT-4o-mini (FT)
89% Fallback - cost-sensitive tasks
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
88% Evaluated - alternative LLM
Llama 3.1 70B (FT)
86% Private cloud option
Mistral Large
81% Eliminated - accuracy gap
Human baseline
78% Reference - senior associate

Benchmark: clause-level risk classification, F1 score across 2,000 annotated examples

What runs under the hood

The tools vary per project - but these are the ones we reach for most often.

LLM Providers
OpenAI GPT-4o Anthropic Claude Google Gemini AWS Bedrock Azure OpenAI Cohere Mistral AI
Open Source LLMs
Llama 3.1 Mistral 7B / 8x7B Qwen 2.5 Phi-3 Falcon BLOOM Whisper
Frameworks
LangChain LlamaIndex Haystack Transformers (HuggingFace) CrewAI AutoGen DSPy
Vector & Search
Pinecone Weaviate Qdrant pgvector Elasticsearch Redis Search Milvus
Computer Vision
PyTorch TensorFlow YOLOv8 / v10 OpenCV CLIP SAM 2 Detectron2
MLOps & Infra
MLflow Weights & Biases Ray Serve Triton Inference Server NVIDIA TensorRT Kubeflow
Monitoring
LangSmith Arize AI Evidently AI Prometheus Grafana Custom eval harnesses

Questions about AI engineering

Honest answers to the things people actually want to know before starting an AI project.

Have a specific use case? Let's talk →
The honest answer is: usually RAG first, fine-tuning if RAG isn't enough for your specific task. RAG is faster to prototype, easier to update with new data, and has lower upfront cost. Fine-tuning is the better call when your task requires consistent output format, domain-specific style, or performance on narrow tasks where in-context examples aren't sufficient. Many of our production systems use both - RAG for knowledge retrieval and a fine-tuned model for the final generation or classification step.
We run a structured evaluation before any production deployment: accuracy against a holdout set, behaviour on adversarial inputs and edge cases, latency under expected peak load, and failure mode analysis. For anything touching safety-critical decisions, we add a second evaluation pass from the relevant domain expert. The metric we care most about is performance relative to the human baseline you're replacing or augmenting - if the AI isn't meaningfully better, it shouldn't go live.
Every AI system we build has a defined failure mode. For high-stakes decisions, that's a human escalation path - the AI outputs a confidence score and routes anything below a threshold to a human reviewer. For lower-stakes applications, we design graceful degradation and build the logging infrastructure to catch and analyse errors in production. We also build retraining pipelines so errors that repeat can be addressed in the next model iteration rather than accumulating.
We work within your data residency and privacy constraints from the start. For organisations that can't send data to external model providers, we deploy open-source models in your private cloud infrastructure. For fine-tuning on sensitive data, we use differential privacy techniques and synthetic data augmentation where appropriate. We've built compliant AI systems for NHS trusts, financial regulators, and government departments - the privacy engineering is a solved problem; it just has to be designed for from day one.
Sometimes - it depends on what your data looks like and what you're trying to do with it. For document-based use cases (contracts, emails, knowledge bases), you often don't need a data warehouse - you need a well-structured RAG pipeline. For training custom models, you need labelled examples, and if your data doesn't have them, we scope a labelling programme first. We'll give you an honest assessment in the first technical session of what's feasible with your current data.
A production-ready AI system for a narrowly-scoped use case - document classification, entity extraction, search - typically takes 8–14 weeks from kickoff to deployment. More complex systems involving computer vision hardware, multi-step agent workflows, or custom training data collection take 16–24 weeks. We don't quote the demo timeline; we quote the production timeline.

Tell us what problem you're trying to solve.

Book a free 60-minute technical session with an AI engineer. We'll review your use case, identify whether the data and approach are feasible, and give you a realistic picture of timeline, cost, and what production-ready looks like for your specific problem.

Start an AI Project
No commitment required
48 AI systems in production
Response within 24 hours